- #Fountas and pinell running record it could be worse how to
- #Fountas and pinell running record it could be worse series
Irene Fountas and Gay Su Pinnell in a YouTube video earlier this year.
These folks just haven’t really benefitted much from the ongoing discussion about what are the best ways to teach kids to read so that the most kids succeed.” They illustrate they still don’t get it and that they’re still part of the problem. “They clarified for me that they haven’t changed at all. Seidenberg said the blog posts offered nothing new.
#Fountas and pinell running record it could be worse how to
If the child were actually given better instruction in how to read the words, then it would obviate the need for using all these different kinds of strategies.” And they’re already being given strategies for dealing with their failures. “If a child is reading ‘pony’ as ‘horse,’ these children haven’t been taught to read. Mark Seidenberg, a cognitive scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who studies reading and language development, said this statement doesn’t square with what decades of scientific research has shown about how reading works. His response is partially correct, but the teacher needs to guide him to stop and work for accuracy.” “If a reader says ‘pony’ for ‘horse’ because of information from the pictures, that tells the teacher that the reader is using meaning information from the pictures, as well as the structure of the language, but is neglecting to use the visual information of the print. “The goal for the reader is accuracy using all sources of information simultaneously,” they wrote.
Fountas and Pinnell reiterated their allegiance to this approach in their blog. The 10-part series, posted on the website of their publisher, Heinemann, was billed as an effort to “offer clarity around mischaracterizations of our work.”Īt the center of the controversy are teaching techniques that encourage children to use context, pictures and sentence structure, along with letters, to identify words.
#Fountas and pinell running record it could be worse series
But Fountas and Pinnell had remained largely silent until earlier this month, when they released a series of blog posts to address the controversy. Since then, Lucy Calkins of Teachers College Columbia, whose work relies on the disproven theory, has admitted she was wrong. But at the core of their approach is a theory about how people read words that has been disproven by cognitive scientists.Ī 2019 podcast episode and story by APM Reports helped bring the discrepancy to wide public attention. Irene Fountas and Gay Su Pinnell, two of the biggest names in literacy education, are breaking their silence in the debate over how best to teach kids to read, responding to criticism that their ideas don’t align with reading science.įountas, a professor at Lesley University in Massachusetts, and Pinnell, professor emeritus at Ohio State, are authors of some of the most widely used instructional materials in American elementary schools, and their approach to teaching reading has held sway for decades.
0 kommentar(er)
